Your local water, explained
Use Irving’s local results, not a neighboring city’s average.
Irving’s 2025 report separates purchased-water data from local distribution results. Its PFAS averages use detected samples only. Hardness is not verified in the report sources used here, so a home test is the next step for softening.
Your water → your home → your system
Your water
The report follows your water provider—not your ZIP code or county boundary.
Only the listed water system is summarized here. Choose “Other / not sure” if your bill shows a different supplier.
Confirm the provider on your bill, or choose “Other / not sure” to continue without a matched report.
Utility data is a starting point. It is not a test of your tap or a live advisory. Sources checked October 22, 2026
2025 report; PFAS and lead samples from 2024
The report separates Dallas-supplied treated-water results from Irving’s own distribution and customer-tap results. The disinfectant, byproduct and lead numbers below use Irving’s results.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Test at homeNo Irving hardness value verified here
We do not substitute Dallas’ hardness number for Irving. A current hardness test can establish whether scale treatment belongs in your system.
2025 report checked
View source ↗2.84ppm
Average; range 0.54–3.98
2025
View source ↗18ppb
Reported average LRAA; range 16–24
2025
View source ↗20ppb
Reported average LRAA; range 13–27
2025
View source ↗0.686ppm
Dallas-supplied water maximum; average 0.627
2025
View source ↗1ppb
Irving tap-sample 90th percentile; 0 sites over AL
2024
View source ↗4–5ppt
Range among detections; detected-only average 4
Historical samples; not a current compliance determination.
2024
View source ↗0.802ppm
Dallas-supplied water maximum
2025
View source ↗Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Test at home No Irving hardness value verified here | 2025 report checked | Not confirmedWe do not substitute Dallas’ hardness number for Irving. A current hardness test can establish whether scale treatment belongs in your system. |
| Chloramine | 2.84 ppmAverage; range 0.54–3.98 | 2025 | Average below 4 ppm MRDL |
| TTHMs | 18 ppbReported average LRAA; range 16–24 | 2025 | Below 80 ppb MCL |
| HAA5 | 20 ppbReported average LRAA; range 13–27 | 2025 | Below 60 ppb MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.686 ppmDallas-supplied water maximum; average 0.627 | 2025 | Below 4 ppm MCL |
| Lead | 1 ppbIrving tap-sample 90th percentile; 0 sites over AL | 2024 | Below 15 ppb action level |
| PFAS — PFOA | 4–5 pptRange among detections; detected-only average 4 | 2024 | Some detections above 4 ppt EPA comparisonHistorical samples; not a current compliance determination. |
| Nitrate as nitrogen | 0.802 ppmDallas-supplied water maximum | 2025 | Below 10 ppm MCL |
| PFAS — PFOS | 4 pptDetected-only average and detected range | 2024 | At 4 ppt EPA comparisonNondetects excluded from the reported average. |
| PFAS — PFBS | 5 pptDetected-only average; range 4–6 | 2024 | No individual federal MCL for this compoundDo not compare this amount with the PFOA/PFOS limits. |
| Copper | 0.272 ppmIrving tap-sample 90th percentile | 2024 | Below 1.3 ppm action level |
| Barium | 0.038 ppmDallas-supplied water maximum | 2025 | Below 2 ppm MCL |
| E. coli | 0 positive samplesIrving distribution monitoring | 2025 | No positive samples reportedThis is historical utility monitoring, not a home test. |
ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.
MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.
PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Irving’s water-report tables distinguish the purchased treated-water supply from water sampled in the Irving distribution system. That distinction changes which result belongs on your city page.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
Irving shares some treated-water figures with Dallas, but its chloramine, disinfection byproducts and lead samples are reported separately. This distinction is why Irving has its own page rather than a copy of the Dallas report.
A useful local question
No. The report says nondetects were excluded from its PFAS average calculations. We label the figures as detected-only averages and show the sample year so they are not mistaken for an overall average or a current tap result.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Sources checked October 22, 2026
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.