Hardness
Very hard377ppm
2025 average; about 22 gpg
Range: 302–474 ppm.
2026 report covering 2025; separate 2025 hardness table
For South Bend Water Works. These data do not describe Mishawaka, other St. Joseph County systems or private wells.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
377ppm
2025 average; about 22 gpg
Range: 302–474 ppm.
1ppm
Highest rolling annual average
29.8ppb
Highest reported locational running annual average
5.2ppb
Highest reported locational running annual average
0.9ppm
Highest result
4.7ppb
90th percentile at sampled taps
First-liter samples; 6 of 238 sites exceeded the action level.
6.5ppm
Highest result, measured as nitrogen
565ppm
2025 average
This is an aesthetic comparison, not a health-based limit. Range: 379–818 ppm.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| 377 ppm average · very hard | 2025 |
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 377 ppm2025 average; about 22 gpg | 2025View source ↗ | Very hardRange: 302–474 ppm. |
| Free chlorine | 1 ppmHighest rolling annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below 4 ppm MRDL |
| TTHMs | 29.8 ppbHighest reported locational running annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below 80 ppb MCL |
| HAA5 | 5.2 ppbHighest reported locational running annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below 60 ppb MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.9 ppmHighest result | 2025View source ↗ | Below 4 ppm MCL |
| Lead | 4.7 ppb90th percentile at sampled taps | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 15 ppb action levelFirst-liter samples; 6 of 238 sites exceeded the action level. |
| Nitrate | 6.5 ppmHighest result, measured as nitrogen | 2025View source ↗ | Below 10 ppm MCL |
| Total dissolved solids | 565 ppm2025 average | 2025View source ↗ | Above 500 ppm aesthetic guidelineThis is an aesthetic comparison, not a health-based limit. Range: 379–818 ppm. |
| Copper | 0.202 ppm90th percentile at sampled taps | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 1.3 ppm action levelA utility percentile is not a test at your tap. |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. South Bend’s municipal supply is groundwater; treatment includes chlorine and fluoride.
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
South Bend and other St. Joseph County providers can have different wellfields, treatment and service lines. Keep the system identity and the original sample date attached to each measurement.
Yes. Hardness concerns mineral scale; the November 2025 notice concerns a shortfall in required sampling. A softener addresses hardness minerals and does not resolve a utility monitoring gap.
A useful local question
Yes. Hardness concerns mineral scale; the November 2025 notice concerns a shortfall in required sampling. A softener addresses hardness minerals and does not resolve a utility monitoring gap.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Confirm the exact system on your water bill. Choose Other / not sure when your supplier is not summarized here.
Sources reviewed November 10, 2026. Individual sampling dates are shown with each result.
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.