Hardness
Test neededNot reported
No numeric hardness in the reviewed report. Test incoming water before softener sizing.
2025 annual reportView source
- 1Your water
- 2Your home
- 3Your system
Gila County water quality report
Showing utility report
Arizona Water Company — Miami
2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
Arizona Water Company — Miami. Match the system name on your water bill.
Your water at a glance
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Chlorine
Below listed limit1.0mg/L
Average; range 0.4–2.0
4 mg/L MRDL
2025View source
PFBS
Detected in some samples5.0ng/L
Average; range ND–37
No individual PFBS limit is listed in this report.
2025View source
PFAS hazard index
Above report’s benchmark1.2
Calculated index reported by the utility
1 — benchmark in report
A report comparison is not a determination of current compliance.
2025View source
Nitrate (as nitrogen)
Below listed limit0.32–5.5mg/L
Reported range across utility and purchased-water samples
10 mg/L MCL
2025View source
Fluoride
Below listed limit0.2–0.39mg/L
Reported sample range
4 mg/L MCL
2025View source
Your provider needs its own report.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →Private well? Start with a current water test.
A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Water hardness by provider
The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| Not reported — test needed | 2025 annual report |
View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.
The numbers behind your report
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not reported No numeric hardness in the reviewed report. Test incoming water before softener sizing. | 2025 annual reportView source ↗ | Test needed |
| Chlorine | 1.0 mg/LAverage; range 0.4–2.0 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit4 mg/L MRDL |
| PFBS | 5.0 ng/LAverage; range ND–37 | 2025View source ↗ | Detected in some samplesNo individual PFBS limit is listed in this report. |
| PFAS hazard index | 1.2 Calculated index reported by the utility | 2025View source ↗ | Above report’s benchmarkA report comparison is not a determination of current compliance. |
| Nitrate (as nitrogen) | 0.32–5.5 mg/LReported range across utility and purchased-water samples | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.2–0.39 mg/LReported sample range | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit4 mg/L MCL |
| Arsenic | 4.8 µg/LHighest running annual average; sample range ND–6.8 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 µg/L MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes | 1.6 µg/LHighest locational running annual average; range ND–4.7 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit80 µg/L MCL |
| PFHxS | 1.4 ng/LAverage; sample range ND–12 | 2025View source ↗ | Detected in some samplesUse the original report for compound-specific context. |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Groundwater from local wells and purchased groundwater from the City of Globe.
Email this report
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
What this means for your home
Compare the Miami water system with your actual supplier before choosing filtration.
The measurements shown belong to Arizona Water Company’s Miami system, which also purchases water from Globe. They are not results for every Globe customer or for Payson, other Gila County systems or private wells.
A useful local question
Can I use Miami’s results for a Payson home?
No. These results describe the named Miami system. A Payson home needs its own supplier’s report and a current hardness test for softener sizing.
Sources and methodology
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Different name on your water bill?
The systems covered here publish separate reports. Use the official links to confirm your utility and system. If yours is not listed, choose Other / not sure.
- Arizona Water Company — Miami ↗2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
- USGS hardness classification
- EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation
Sources reviewed November 14, 2026. Individual sample years are shown with each result.
Your water → your home → your system
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Your homeFind my system →