Hardness
Test neededNot reported
No numeric hardness in the reviewed report. Test incoming water before softener sizing.
2025 annual reportView source
- 1Your water
- 2Your home
- 3Your system
Apache County water quality report
Showing utility report
Town of Springerville
2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
Town of Springerville. Match the system name on your water bill.
Your water at a glance
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
PFAS (six listed compounds)
Not detected in these samplesNot detected
PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS and GenX
These results apply to the six named compounds and sampling period; nondetect does not mean zero.
November 2023–October 2024View source
Nitrate (as nitrogen)
Below listed limit0.77mg/L
Highest result; range ND–0.770
10 mg/L MCL
February 2025View source
Fluoride
Below listed limit0.32mg/L
Reported result
4 mg/L MCL
February 2025View source
Lead (90th percentile)
Utility clarification needed11µg/L
One sample above the action level; report flags the row Y
15 µg/L action level
2025View source
Sodium
No limit listed90mg/L
Highest result; range 34–90
Sodium is not a hardness measurement.
February 2025View source
Your provider needs its own report.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →Private well? Start with a current water test.
A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Water hardness by provider
The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| Not reported — test needed | 2025 annual report |
View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.
The numbers behind your report
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not reported No numeric hardness in the reviewed report. Test incoming water before softener sizing. | 2025 annual reportView source ↗ | Test needed |
| PFAS (six listed compounds) | Not detected PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS and GenX | November 2023–October 2024View source ↗ | Not detected in these samplesThese results apply to the six named compounds and sampling period; nondetect does not mean zero. |
| Nitrate (as nitrogen) | 0.77 mg/LHighest result; range ND–0.770 | February 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.32 mg/LReported result | February 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit4 mg/L MCL |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 11 µg/LOne sample above the action level; report flags the row Y | 2025View source ↗ | Utility clarification needed15 µg/L action level |
| Sodium | 90 mg/LHighest result; range 34–90 | February 2025View source ↗ | No limit listedSodium is not a hardness measurement. |
| Copper (90th percentile) | 0.28 mg/LOne sample exceeded the listed action level | 2025View source ↗ | One sample above action level1.3 mg/L action level |
| Combined radium | 0.88 pCi/LRunning annual average; range ND–1.5 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit5 pCi/L MCL |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Groundwater from eight wells in the White Mountain aquifer.
Email this report
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
What this means for your home
Start with your supplier: Springerville results do not describe every Apache County community.
This guide uses the Town of Springerville’s 2025 report. Eagar, St. Johns, tribal systems, other utilities and private wells have separate sources and monitoring. The report’s older PFAS samples are labeled by date.
A useful local question
Which Apache County water system is shown?
The Town of Springerville, PWS AZ0401013. Use that system only if it matches your bill. For another utility or a private well, obtain its own results before choosing treatment.
Sources and methodology
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Different name on your water bill?
The systems covered here publish separate reports. Use the official links to confirm your utility and system. If yours is not listed, choose Other / not sure.
- Town of Springerville ↗2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
- USGS hardness classification
- EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation
Sources reviewed November 14, 2026. Individual sample years are shown with each result.
Your water → your home → your system
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Your homeFind my system →