Hardness
Test neededNot reported
No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing.
2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
Arizona Water Company Sierra Vista, system AZ0402004. This is separate from Liberty’s Bella Vista systems and other water suppliers serving Sierra Vista addresses.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Not reported
No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing.
1.1mg/L
Reported result; range 0.7–1.8
4 mg/L MRDL
ND–1.1µg/L
Sample range
10 µg/L MCL
0.097–0.19mg/L
Sample range
4 mg/L MCL
0.1–3.6mg/L
Reported sample result or range
10 mg/L MCL
8µg/L
Highest running annual average; range 7.8–8
80 µg/L MCL
2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
Arizona Water Company Bisbee. Match the supplier on your bill before using these results.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Not reported
No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing.
0.93mg/L
Reported result; range 0.23–1.25
4 mg/L MRDL
7.2ng/L
Average; range 4.7–9.7
4 ng/L benchmark in report
2.2mg/L
Reported sample result or range
10 mg/L MCL
0.23mg/L
Reported result
4 mg/L MCL
11µg/L
Highest running annual average
80 µg/L MCL
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| Not reported — test needed | 2025 annual report | |
| Not reported — test needed | 2025 annual report |
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not reported No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing. | 2025 annual reportView source ↗ | Test needed |
| Chlorine | 1.1 mg/LReported result; range 0.7–1.8 | 2025View source ↗ | Below disinfectant limit4 mg/L MRDL |
| Arsenic | ND–1.1 µg/LSample range | April–May 2024View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 µg/L MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.097–0.19 mg/LSample range | May 2024View source ↗ | Below listed limit4 mg/L MCL |
| Nitrate (as nitrogen) | 0.1–3.6 mg/LReported sample result or range | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes | 8 µg/LHighest running annual average; range 7.8–8 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit80 µg/L MCL |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 1.5 µg/LHighest running annual average; range ND–2.1 | May 2024 / 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit60 µg/L MCL |
| Sodium | 14–24 mg/LSample range | April–May 2024View source ↗ | No listed standard |
| Lead | ND µg/L90th percentile; no samples above the listed action level | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit15 µg/L action level |
| Copper | 0.14 mg/L90th percentile | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit1.3 mg/L action level |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Groundwater wells in the Sierra Vista and Sulger areas.
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not reported No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing. | 2025 annual reportView source ↗ | Test needed |
| Chlorine | 0.93 mg/LReported result; range 0.23–1.25 | 2025View source ↗ | Below disinfectant limit4 mg/L MRDL |
| PFOA | 7.2 ng/LAverage; range 4.7–9.7 | 2025View source ↗ | Above report’s benchmark4 ng/L benchmark in report |
| Nitrate (as nitrogen) | 2.2 mg/LReported sample result or range | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.23 mg/LReported result | April 2021View source ↗ | Below listed limit4 mg/L MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes | 11 µg/LHighest running annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit80 µg/L MCL |
| Arsenic | 3.4 µg/LReported result | April 2021View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 µg/L MCL |
| Barium | 0.3 mg/LReported result | April 2021View source ↗ | Below listed limit2 mg/L MCL |
| PFOS | ND ng/LReported nondetect | 2025View source ↗ | Not detected in these samplesNondetect is not a claim of zero PFAS. |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Groundwater supplied from wells in the Naco area.
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
Sierra Vista and Bisbee have separate utility reports, sampling dates and treatment priorities.
This guide covers Arizona Water Company’s Sierra Vista and Bisbee systems. Liberty Bella Vista, Douglas, Benson, other utilities and private wells need their own reports. Compare sampling dates carefully: some entries in the 2025 annual reports were tested in earlier years.
A useful local question
Use the supplier and system name on your water bill. Arizona Water Company Sierra Vista and Bisbee results are shown separately here; a Sierra Vista address alone does not identify the provider. If your supplier is not listed, use its official report and test hardness before softener sizing.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
The systems covered here publish separate reports. Use the official links to confirm your utility and system. If yours is not listed, choose Other / not sure.
Sources reviewed November 8, 2026. Individual sample years are shown with each result.
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.