Hardness
Test neededNot reported
No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing.
2025 annual reportView source
- 1Your water
- 2Your home
- 3Your system
Yavapai County water quality report
Showing utility report
Arizona Water Company — Sedona
2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
Arizona Water Company Sedona, system AZ0403003. Sedona crosses the Yavapai–Coconino county line; these figures belong to this utility, not either county as a whole.
Your water at a glance
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Chlorine
Below disinfectant limit1.1mg/L
Reported result; range 0.7–1.2
4 mg/L MRDL
2025View source
Arsenic
Below listed limit7.0µg/L
Highest running annual average; samples 4.1–8.4
10 µg/L MCL
2025View source
Total trihalomethanes
Below listed limit1.1µg/L
Highest running annual average; range ND–2.4
80 µg/L MCL
2025View source
Nitrate (as nitrogen)
Below listed limitND–2mg/L
Reported sample result or range
10 mg/L MCL
2025View source
PFOA
Dated PFAS result1ng/L
Reported average; range ND–10
4 ng/L benchmark in report
Individual samples and average differ; review the original report.
September 2023 / March 2024View source
Showing utility report
City of Prescott
2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
City of Prescott municipal customers. The hardness below comes from the city FAQ, not a countywide estimate or a 2025 sample range.
Your water at a glance
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Hardness
Moderately hard to hard75–130mg/L
Utility FAQ; approximately 4.4–7.6 grains per gallon
Confirm current hardness at your home.
Undated city guidanceView source
Annual report
Official report available2025
The city links its 2025 Consumer Confidence Report. Open the official report for contaminant results.
2025 annual reportView source
Your provider needs its own report.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →Private well? Start with a current water test.
A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Water hardness by provider
The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| Not reported — test needed | 2025 annual report | |
| 75–130 mg/L · about 4.4–7.6 gpg | Undated city FAQ |
View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.
The numbers behind your report
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not reported No numeric hardness in the reviewed annual report. Test incoming water before softener sizing. | 2025 annual reportView source ↗ | Test needed |
| Chlorine | 1.1 mg/LReported result; range 0.7–1.2 | 2025View source ↗ | Below disinfectant limit4 mg/L MRDL |
| Arsenic | 7.0 µg/LHighest running annual average; samples 4.1–8.4 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 µg/L MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes | 1.1 µg/LHighest running annual average; range ND–2.4 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit80 µg/L MCL |
| Nitrate (as nitrogen) | ND–2 mg/LReported sample result or range | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| PFOA | 1 ng/LReported average; range ND–10 | September 2023 / March 2024View source ↗ | Dated PFAS resultIndividual samples and average differ; review the original report. |
| Barium | 0.2–0.3 mg/LSample range | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit2 mg/L MCL |
| Sodium | 7.4–21 mg/LSample range | 2025View source ↗ | No listed standard |
| Lead | 6 µg/L90th percentile; one sample above the listed action level | 2025View source ↗ | Review individual results15 µg/L action level |
| Copper | 0.35 mg/L90th percentile; no samples above the listed action level | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit1.3 mg/L action level |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Groundwater wells in the Verde River basin throughout the Sedona area.
View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.
The numbers behind your report
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 75–130 mg/LUtility FAQ; approximately 4.4–7.6 grains per gallon | Undated city guidanceView source ↗ | Moderately hard to hardConfirm current hardness at your home. |
| Annual report | 2025 The city links its 2025 Consumer Confidence Report. Open the official report for contaminant results. | 2025 annual reportView source ↗ | Official report available |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Municipal groundwater supply. Confirm City of Prescott on your bill; Prescott Valley is a separate provider.
Email this report
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
What this means for your home
Prescott and Sedona draw on different groundwater systems. Match your water bill before using a result.
This guide separates Arizona Water Company’s Sedona report from Prescott’s published hardness guidance. It does not substitute either for Prescott Valley, Cottonwood, Camp Verde, another supplier or a private well. Sedona also extends into Coconino County.
A useful local question
How hard is the water in Yavapai County?
There is no single county hardness value. Prescott publishes 75–130 mg/L in its FAQ, spanning moderately hard to hard water. Arizona Water Company’s reviewed Sedona report does not list hardness. Test incoming water to select softener size and settings.
Sources and methodology
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Different name on your water bill?
The systems covered here publish separate reports. Use the official links to confirm your utility and system. If yours is not listed, choose Other / not sure.
- Arizona Water Company — Sedona ↗2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
- City of Prescott ↗2025 annual report; individual sample dates shown
- City of Prescott — 2025 report announcement ↗
- City of Prescott · Hardness source ↗
- USGS hardness classification
- EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation
Sources reviewed November 8, 2026. Individual sample years are shown with each result.
Your water → your home → your system
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Your homeFind my system →