Hardness
Cannot assess high or lowNot verified
No confirmed numerical hardness value used in this summary
Unknown hardness is not zero. A current incoming-water test can guide softening.
2025 report review
View source ↗- 1Your water
- 2Your home
- 3Your system
Your local water, explained
Montgomery County Water Quality Report
City water and MUD water need their own reports.
Review City of Conroe or The Woodlands MUD No. 1 only when that system matches your bill. Montgomery County and The Woodlands are not each a single water system.
Find My Water System →
Your water → your home → your system
Your homeFind my system →
Your water
Match the name on your water bill.
The report follows your water provider—not your ZIP code or county boundary.
Only the listed water system is summarized here. Choose “Other / not sure” if your bill shows a different supplier.
Confirm the provider on your bill, or choose “Other / not sure” to continue without a matched report.
Utility data is a starting point. It is not a test of your tap or a live advisory. Sources checked October 23, 2026
Choose the right utility report
The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| Not verified · Cannot assess high or low | 2025 report review | |
| Not verified · Cannot assess high or low | 2025 report review |
Showing utility report
City of Conroe
2025 report; each row keeps its measurement year
City of Conroe municipal system; surrounding MUDs and private wells have separate reports.
Your water at a glance
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Chlorine
Average below MRDL0.97 mg/L
Average; range 0.70–1.50
MRDL 4 mg/L
2025
View source ↗TTHMs
Below MCL33.8 µg/L
Highest listed LRAA,36Village Hill; range 20–33.8 at that site
MCL 80 µg/L
2025
View source ↗HAA5
Below MCL15.9 µg/L
Highest listed LRAA,110Baretta; range<6–15.9 at that site
MCL 60 µg/L
2025
View source ↗Fluoride
Below MCL0.22 mg/L
Highest detected; range 0–0.22
MCL 4 mg/L
2025-03-24
View source ↗Lead
90th percentile below action level0 µg/L reported
90th percentile; range 0–1.5; not zero at every tap
Action level 15 µg/L
2023–2025
View source ↗PFAS
Cannot assess high or lowNot verified
No compound-specific result assessed in this summary
This does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment.
2025 report review
View source ↗Nitrate
Below MCL0.42 mg/L
Highest detected; range 0–0.42
MCL 10 mg/L
2025-11-17
View source ↗View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.
The numbers behind your report
Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not verified No confirmed numerical hardness value used in this summary | 2025 report reviewView source ↗ | Cannot assess high or lowUnknown hardness is not zero. A current incoming-water test can guide softening. |
| Chlorine | 0.97 mg/L Average; range 0.70–1.50 | 2025View source ↗ | Average below MRDL · MRDL 4 mg/L |
| TTHM | 33.8 µg/L Highest listed LRAA,36Village Hill; range 20–33.8 at that site | 2025View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 80 µg/L |
| HAA5 | 15.9 µg/L Highest listed LRAA,110Baretta; range<6–15.9 at that site | 2025View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 60 µg/L |
| Fluoride | 0.22 mg/L Highest detected; range 0–0.22 | 2025-03-24View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 4 mg/L |
| Nitrate | 0.42 mg/L Highest detected; range 0–0.42 | 2025-11-17View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 10 mg/L |
| Lead | 0 µg/L reported 90th percentile; range 0–1.5; not zero at every tap | 2023–2025View source ↗ | 90th percentile below action level · Action level 15 µg/LA system sampling percentile is not a measurement of your faucet. |
| Copper | 0.275 mg/L 90th percentile; range 0.00143–0.677 | 2023–2025View source ↗ | 90th percentile below action level · Action level 1.3 mg/LA system sampling percentile is not a measurement of your faucet. |
| PFAS | Not verified No compound-specific result assessed in this summary | 2025 report reviewView source ↗ | Cannot assess high or lowThis does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment. |
ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.
MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.
PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. SJRA Lake Conroe surface water and groundwater from Jasper and Catahoula aquifers.
Showing utility report
The Woodlands MUD No.1
2025 report; each row keeps its measurement year
Applies only to The Woodlands MUD1, not every Woodlands MUD or Creekside Park. Use Woodlands Water's Find Your MUD tool and the report for the exact district on the bill.
Your water at a glance
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Hardness
Cannot assess high or lowNot verified
No confirmed numerical hardness value used in this summary
Unknown hardness is not zero. A current incoming-water test can guide softening.
2025 report review
View source ↗Free chlorine
Average below MRDL1.91 mg/L
Average; range 0.45–3.66
MRDL 4 mg/L
2025
View source ↗TTHMs
Below MCL41 µg/L
Highest listed LRAA, DBP2-01; sampled range 31.9–42.4 at that site
MCL 80 µg/L
2025
View source ↗HAA5
Below MCL15 µg/L
Highest listed LRAA, DBP2-01; range 8.3–15 at that site
MCL 60 µg/L
2025
View source ↗Fluoride
Below MCL; supplier result, not MUD tap sample0.43 mg/L
Supplier TX1700197 highest value; range 0.17–0.43; separate appendix
MCL 4 mg/L
2025
View source ↗Lead
90th percentile below action level1.07 µg/L
90th percentile; range 0–10.7; zero sites above AL
Action level 15 µg/L
2021–2023
View source ↗PFAS
Cannot assess high or lowNot verified
No compound-specific result assessed in this summary
This does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment.
2025 report review
View source ↗Nitrate
Below MCL0.21 mg/L
Highest detected; range 0–0.21
MCL 10 mg/L
2025-02-27
View source ↗View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.
The numbers behind your report
Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Not verified No confirmed numerical hardness value used in this summary | 2025 report reviewView source ↗ | Cannot assess high or lowUnknown hardness is not zero. A current incoming-water test can guide softening. |
| Free chlorine | 1.91 mg/L Average; range 0.45–3.66 | 2025View source ↗ | Average below MRDL · MRDL 4 mg/L |
| TTHM | 41 µg/L Highest listed LRAA, DBP2-01; sampled range 31.9–42.4 at that site | 2025View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 80 µg/L |
| HAA5 | 15 µg/L Highest listed LRAA, DBP2-01; range 8.3–15 at that site | 2025View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 60 µg/L |
| Nitrate | 0.21 mg/L Highest detected; range 0–0.21 | 2025-02-27View source ↗ | Below MCL · MCL 10 mg/L |
| Lead | 1.07 µg/L 90th percentile; range 0–10.7; zero sites above AL | 2021–2023View source ↗ | 90th percentile below action level · Action level 15 µg/LA system sampling percentile is not a measurement of your faucet. |
| Copper | 0.252 mg/L 90th percentile; range 0.0274–0.901 | 2021–2023View source ↗ | 90th percentile below action level · Action level 1.3 mg/LA system sampling percentile is not a measurement of your faucet. |
| Fluoride — SJRA supplier | 0.43 mg/L Supplier TX1700197 highest value; range 0.17–0.43; separate appendix | 2025View source ↗ | Below MCL; supplier result, not MUD tap sample · MCL 4 mg/L |
| PFAS | Not verified No compound-specific result assessed in this summary | 2025 report reviewView source ↗ | Cannot assess high or lowThis does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment. |
ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.
MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.
PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Purchased SJRA groundwater and treated surface water. Groundwater from Evangeline/Jasper aquifers blends with treated Lake Conroe water.
Your provider needs its own report.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →Private well? Start with a current water test.
A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Email this report
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
What this means for your home
Conroe and Woodlands districts can use combinations of surface water and groundwater, but their distribution results remain separate. The Woodlands report here is specifically MUD No. 1. Other districts, including a different MUD on your bill, need their own reports.
Related city reports
A useful local question
Does The Woodlands MUD No. 1 report cover all of The Woodlands?
No. Woodlands Water publishes reports by district. Confirm your MUD before applying a number to your home, and do not use a public-utility result as a private-well test.
Sources and methodology
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
- City of Conroe ↗2025 report; each row keeps its measurement year
- The Woodlands MUD No.1 ↗2025 report; each row keeps its measurement year
- Find the report for your Woodlands MUD ↗
- USGS hardness classification
- EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation
Sources checked October 23, 2026
Your water → your home → your system
Turn your report into a plan for your home.
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Your homeFind my system →