Hardness
Hard130–150ppm
Combined reported range at two treatment plants
Borman Park: level found 140 ppm; Ogden Dunes: 143 ppm. About 7.6–8.8 gpg.
2025 report; individual sample dates shown
For Northwest Indiana Operations (IN5245015). Match this system to your bill; these results do not represent every utility in Lake or Porter County.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
130–150ppm
Combined reported range at two treatment plants
Borman Park: level found 140 ppm; Ogden Dunes: 143 ppm. About 7.6–8.8 gpg.
2.24ppm
Highest running annual average
Individual results: 0.52–2.81 ppm.
24.9ppb
Highest reported locational running annual average
12.5ppb
Highest reported locational running annual average
0.14ppm
Ogden Dunes result; Borman Park ND
ND means not detected, not zero.
3ppb
90th percentile at sampled taps
A utility percentile is not a test at your tap.
0.057ppm
90th percentile at sampled taps
A utility percentile is not a test at your tap.
0.37ppm
Ogden Dunes; Borman Park 0.28 ppm
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| 130–150 ppm · hard | 2025 |
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 130–150 ppmCombined reported range at two treatment plants | 2025View source ↗ | HardBorman Park: level found 140 ppm; Ogden Dunes: 143 ppm. About 7.6–8.8 gpg. |
| Chloramines | 2.24 ppmHighest running annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below 4 ppm MRDLIndividual results: 0.52–2.81 ppm. |
| TTHMs | 24.9 ppbHighest reported locational running annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below 80 ppb MCL |
| HAA5 | 12.5 ppbHighest reported locational running annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below 60 ppb MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.14 ppmOgden Dunes result; Borman Park ND | 2025View source ↗ | Below 4 ppm MCLND means not detected, not zero. |
| Lead | 3 ppb90th percentile at sampled taps | 2024View source ↗ | Below the report’s 15 ppb action levelA utility percentile is not a test at your tap. |
| Copper | 0.057 ppm90th percentile at sampled taps | 2024View source ↗ | Below the report’s 1.3 ppm action levelA utility percentile is not a test at your tap. |
| Nitrate | 0.37 ppmOgden Dunes; Borman Park 0.28 ppm | 2025View source ↗ | Below 10 ppm MCL |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Lake Michigan supplies the Borman Park and Ogden Dunes filtration plants. A Lake Station groundwater plant is a backup source.
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
The two treatment plants report separate hardness figures. Match the provider first, then confirm incoming hardness and the exact filter’s chloramine reduction performance.
No. This page summarizes Indiana American Water’s Northwest Indiana Operations. Other suppliers in Lake County publish separate reports, and groundwater or private-well results should not be inferred from these two plants.
A useful local question
No. This page summarizes Indiana American Water’s Northwest Indiana Operations. Other suppliers in Lake County publish separate reports, and groundwater or private-well results should not be inferred from these two plants.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Confirm the exact system on your water bill. Choose Other / not sure when your supplier is not summarized here.
Sources reviewed November 10, 2026. Individual sampling dates are shown with each result.
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.