Hardness
Very hard15–20gpg · utility’s typical range
Approximately 257–342 mg/L as CaCO₃. Above the USGS very-hard threshold of 180 mg/L. This is utility guidance, not a tap measurement.
2026 report using 2025 data; 2024 lead samples
SAWS Main System only. The report also lists purchased-water systems; those tables are not treated as direct measurements at every San Antonio tap.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
15–20gpg · utility’s typical range
Approximately 257–342 mg/L as CaCO₃. Above the USGS very-hard threshold of 180 mg/L. This is utility guidance, not a tap measurement.
1.46ppm
Average; range 0.16–3.7
86.2ppb
Reported highest level; report marks no violation
The number and the report’s compliance statement conflict.
30.6ppb
Reported highest level
0.69ppm
Maximum; range <0.5–0.69
1.6ppb
90th percentile; 0 sites over action level
A utility percentile does not rule out lead at your tap.
Not quantified here
No compound-specific result used in this summary
Ask SAWS for the current PFAS monitoring results.
2.45ppm
Maximum
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →The figures below are provider-specific. They are not a countywide average.
| Utility | Hardness | Hardness source |
|---|---|---|
| Very hard | Current SAWS FAQ; sampling year not specified |
Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 15–20 gpg · utility’s typical range | Current SAWS FAQ; sampling year not specified | Very hardApproximately 257–342 mg/L as CaCO₃. Above the USGS very-hard threshold of 180 mg/L. This is utility guidance, not a tap measurement. |
| Free chlorine | 1.46 ppmAverage; range 0.16–3.7 | 2025 | Average below 4 ppm MRDL |
| TTHMs | 86.2 ppbReported highest level; report marks no violation | 2025 | Above 80 ppb comparison; clarification neededThe number and the report’s compliance statement conflict. |
| HAA5 | 30.6 ppbReported highest level | 2025 | Below 60 ppb MCL |
| Fluoride | 0.69 ppmMaximum; range <0.5–0.69 | 2025 | Below 4 ppm MCL |
| Lead | 1.6 ppb90th percentile; 0 sites over action level | 2024 | Below 15 ppb action levelA utility percentile does not rule out lead at your tap. |
| PFAS | Not quantified here No compound-specific result used in this summary | 2026 report | Cannot assess high or lowAsk SAWS for the current PFAS monitoring results. |
| Nitrate as nitrogen | 2.45 ppmMaximum | 2025 | Below 10 ppm MCL |
| Barium | 0.125 ppmMaximum | 2025 | Below 2 ppm MCL |
| Copper | 0.187 ppm90th percentile | 2024 | Below 1.3 ppm action level |
| Selenium | 3.1 ppbMaximum | 2025 | Below 50 ppb MCL |
| Combined radium 226/228 | 1.5 pCi/LMaximum | 2025 | Below 5 pCi/L MCL |
| Uranium | 1.7 µg/LMaximum | 2024 | Below 30 µg/L MCL |
ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.
MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.
PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. SAWS draws from several aquifers and some surface-water sources. Its typical hardness guidance is especially useful when choosing scale treatment.
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
Start with the system name on your bill.
Bexar County is a browsing area, not a single water system. SAWS Main System’s typical hardness guidance supports a filter-and-softener recommendation for matching homes, but does not establish the water chemistry of a private well or another utility.
A useful local question
No. The initial report covers SAWS Main System. Other utilities, separate SAWS systems and private wells must be assessed using their own current reports or water tests.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Sources checked October 22, 2026
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.