Free U.S. shipping on every product · No minimum
Engineered & assembled in the USAStraightforward licensed-plumber installationCrystal Quest · Since 1994
  1. 1Your water
  2. 2Your home
  3. 3Your system

Your local water, explained

Denton Water Quality Report

Verified city results. No borrowed hardness estimate.

Denton's 2025 report provides chloramine and contaminant results but does not quantify hardness in the reviewed tables. Filtration can still be considered; a current hardness test establishes whether a softener belongs in the plan.

Find My Water System →

Your water → your home → your system

Your water

Match the name on your water bill.

The report follows your water provider—not your ZIP code or county boundary.

Only the listed water system is summarized here. Choose “Other / not sure” if your bill shows a different supplier.

Utility data is a starting point. It is not a test of your tap or a live advisory. Sources checked October 23, 2026

Showing utility report

City of Denton

2025 data; lead and copper2024

Results for City of Denton customers. Confirm the retail utility and system on your bill.

Your water at a glance

See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.

Hardness

Cannot assess high or low

Not quantifiedmg/L as CaCO₃

No hardness measurement provided in the reviewed municipal CCR

The report does not establish whether your incoming water is hard; obtain a hardness test before setting a softener.

2025 report reviewed

View source ↗

Chloramine

Below 4 ppm annual MRDL comparison

3.21 averageppm

Reported average; single samples0.08–4.50 ppm

Chloramine is used for disinfection; the annual measure and individual sample maximum are different.

2025

View source ↗

TTHMs

Below 80 ppb comparison

13ppb

Maximum locational running annual average

Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.

2025

View source ↗

HAA5

Below 60 ppb comparison

11ppb

Maximum locational running annual average; report prints HAAS

Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.

2025

View source ↗

Fluoride

Below 4 ppm comparison

0.51 averageppm

Reported average; maximum 0.723 ppm

Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.

January 15, 2025

View source ↗

Lead

Below 15 ppb action level

1.5ppb

90th-percentile tap sampling result; zero sites above the action level

This system-level sampling statistic is not a result for your home; plumbing can affect lead at an individual tap.

2024

View source ↗

PFAS

Cannot assess high or low

Not verified

No compound-specific result assessed in this summary

This does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment.

2025 report review

View source ↗

Nitrate

Below 10 ppm comparison

0.339 averageppm

Reported average; maximum 0.364 ppm

Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.

January 15, 2025

View source ↗
View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.

The numbers behind your report

Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.

Open the complete utility report ↗

What was measuredReported amountSample year / source dateHow to read it
Water hardnessNot quantified mg/L as CaCO₃No hardness measurement provided in the reviewed municipal CCR2025 report reviewedView source ↗Unknown—not zeroThe report does not establish whether your incoming water is hard; obtain a hardness test before setting a softener.
Chloramine3.21 average ppmReported average; single samples0.08–4.50 ppm2025View source ↗Below 4 ppm annual MRDL comparisonChloramine is used for disinfection; the annual measure and individual sample maximum are different.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)13 ppbMaximum locational running annual average2025View source ↗Below 80 ppb comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)11 ppbMaximum locational running annual average; report prints HAAS2025View source ↗Below 60 ppb comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
Fluoride0.51 average ppmReported average; maximum 0.723 ppmJanuary 15, 2025View source ↗Below 4 ppm comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
Nitrate0.339 average ppmReported average; maximum 0.364 ppmJanuary 15, 2025View source ↗Below 10 ppm comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
Lead1.5 ppb90th-percentile tap sampling result; zero sites above the action level2024View source ↗Below 15 ppb action levelThis system-level sampling statistic is not a result for your home; plumbing can affect lead at an individual tap.
Copper0.6335 ppm90th-percentile tap sampling result; zero sites above the action level2024View source ↗Below 1.3 ppm action levelBelow the action level used in this report; this is not a measurement at every customer’s tap.
PFASNot verified No compound-specific result assessed in this summary2025 report reviewView source ↗Cannot assess high or lowThis does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment.

ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.

MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.

PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗

Turn your report into a plan for your home.

Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.

Find My Water System →

Next: match my home →

Source water. Denton treats surface water from Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts. These are its own utility sources; NTMWD hardness should not be substituted for Denton municipal water.

Email this report

Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.

More about your local water

What this means for your home

City of Denton treats water from Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts. NTMWD plant hardness from Frisco or Plano is not a substitute for Denton municipal data. A missing hardness value is not a zero or a soft-water result.

A useful local question

Can I choose a filter before Denton hardness is confirmed?

Yes. Filtration for the identified treatment and taste goals can be considered while hardness is measured separately. A softener treats hardness minerals; it is not a substitute for choosing the correct filter.

Sources and methodology

We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.

Sources checked October 23, 2026

Your water → your home → your system

Turn your report into a plan for your home.

Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.

Find My Water System →