Free U.S. shipping on every product · No minimum
Engineered & assembled in the USAStraightforward licensed-plumber installationCrystal Quest · Since 1994
  1. 1Your water
  2. 2Your home
  3. 3Your system

Your local water, explained

Dallas Water Quality Report: Hardness, Chloramine & More

Current contaminant results. Clearly dated hardness guidance.

Dallas uses chloramine and publishes a separate water-quality report from neighboring cities. Its older utility hardness guidance is 120–155 mg/L; use that context alongside a current home test when selecting softening.

Find My Water System →

Your water → your home → your system

Your water

Match the name on your water bill.

The report follows your water provider—not your ZIP code or county boundary.

Only the listed water system is summarized here. Choose “Other / not sure” if your bill shows a different supplier.

Utility data is a starting point. It is not a test of your tap or a live advisory. Sources checked October 22, 2026

Showing utility report

Dallas Water Utilities

2025 report; hardness from December 2023 memo

Dallas Water Utilities results apply to that supplier, not every city in Dallas County. Irving, Garland and Grand Prairie have separate distribution-system results.

Your water at a glance

See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.

Hardness

Moderately hard to hard

120–155mg/L as CaCO₃ · published range

7.0–9.1 gpg. This older utility guidance is useful context, not a 2025 measurement or a test of your home.

December 2023 utility memo

View source ↗

Chloramine / total chlorine

Average below 4 ppm MRDL

2.97ppm

Average total chlorine residual; range 2.75–3.18

2025

View source ↗

TTHMs

Below 80 ppb MCL

19.7ppb

Highest locational running annual average

2025

View source ↗

HAA5

Below 60 ppb MCL

15.1ppb

Highest locational running annual average

2025

View source ↗

Lead

Below 15 ppb action level

1.1ppb

90th percentile; 0 sites over action level

An individual home may differ.

2024

View source ↗

PFAS

Cannot assess high or low

Not quantified here

No compound-specific result used in this summary

Ask DWU for current PFAS monitoring.

2025 report

View source ↗

Nitrate as nitrogen

Below 10 ppm MCL

0.802ppm

Maximum; average 0.671

2025

View source ↗
View Full Water ReportOpen the measured results, dates, comparisons and original utility report.

The numbers behind your report

Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.

Open the complete utility report ↗

What was measuredReported amountSample year / source dateHow to read it
Hardness120–155 mg/L as CaCO₃ · published rangeDecember 2023 utility memoModerately hard to hard7.0–9.1 gpg. This older utility guidance is useful context, not a 2025 measurement or a test of your home.
Chloramine / total chlorine2.97 ppmAverage total chlorine residual; range 2.75–3.182025Average below 4 ppm MRDL
TTHMs19.7 ppbHighest locational running annual average2025Below 80 ppb MCL
HAA515.1 ppbHighest locational running annual average2025Below 60 ppb MCL
Fluoride0.686 ppmMaximum; average 0.6272025Below 4 ppm MCL
Lead1.1 ppb90th percentile; 0 sites over action level2024Below 15 ppb action levelAn individual home may differ.
PFASNot quantified here No compound-specific result used in this summary2025 reportCannot assess high or lowAsk DWU for current PFAS monitoring.
Nitrate as nitrogen0.802 ppmMaximum; average 0.6712025Below 10 ppm MCL
Barium0.038 ppmMaximum2025Below 2 ppm MCL
Copper0.39 ppm90th percentile2024Below 1.3 ppm action level
Cyanide76.8 ppbMaximum2025Below 200 ppb MCL
Atrazine0.10 ppbMaximum2025Below 3 ppb MCL
Turbidity0.16 NTUHighest single measurement2025Below 1 NTU single-measurement criterion

ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.

MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.

PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗

Turn your report into a plan for your home.

Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.

Find My Water System →

Next: match my home →

Source water. Dallas uses surface water. Its treatment information identifies chloramine for distribution-system disinfection.

Email this report

Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.

More about your local water

What this means for your home

A Dallas postal address and a Dallas Water Utilities account are not always the same thing. Confirm the utility first. This page separates older hardness guidance from the 2025 contaminant results instead of silently presenting every number as current.

A useful local question

Why is Dallas hardness dated differently from the report?

The 2025 water-quality report supplies the contaminant results here. The verified numerical hardness range comes from a December 2023 city memorandum, so it is labeled as older guidance rather than a new measurement.

Sources and methodology

We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.

Sources checked October 22, 2026

Your water → your home → your system

Turn your report into a plan for your home.

Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.

Find My Water System →