Hardness
Moderately hard to hard108–150mg/L as CaCO₃
Range in secondary-constituent table
The range crosses the USGS hard-water threshold of 121 mg/L; hardness concerns scale and spotting, not a health violation.
2025
View source ↗Your local water, explained
Understand the hardness range and chloramine results.
Fort Worth's 2025 report spans moderately hard to hard water and identifies chloramine treatment. Use these utility results to plan filtration and scale control, then have your plumber confirm the incoming water and system fit.
Your water → your home → your system
Your water
The report follows your water provider—not your ZIP code or county boundary.
Only the listed water system is summarized here. Choose “Other / not sure” if your bill shows a different supplier.
Confirm the provider on your bill, or choose “Other / not sure” to continue without a matched report.
Utility data is a starting point. It is not a test of your tap or a live advisory. Sources checked October 23, 2026
2025 data; lead and copper 2025
Results for City of Fort Worth customers. Confirm the retail utility and system on your bill.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
108–150mg/L as CaCO₃
Range in secondary-constituent table
The range crosses the USGS hard-water threshold of 121 mg/L; hardness concerns scale and spotting, not a health violation.
2025
View source ↗3.3ppm
“Your water” value in the results table; range 0.93–4.7 ppm
Chloramine is used for disinfection. A filtration system targeting it needs the appropriate media and contact time; a single sample is not the same as the regulated annual measure.
2025
View source ↗13.8ppb
Utility-reported “Your water” result; not the maximum sample
Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
2025
View source ↗9.3ppb
Utility-reported “Your water” result; not the maximum sample
Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
2025
View source ↗0.7ppm
Utility-reported “Your water” result
Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
2025
View source ↗3.1ppb
90th-percentile tap sampling result; zero sites above the action level
This system-level sampling statistic is not a result for your home; plumbing can affect lead at an individual tap.
2025
View source ↗Not verified
No compound-specific result assessed in this summary
This does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment.
2025 report review
View source ↗0.7ppm
Utility-reported “Your water” result
Below the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap.
2025
View source ↗Selected useful results—not a replacement for the utility’s complete report. Older measurements retain their original year.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water hardness | 108–150 mg/L as CaCO₃Range in secondary-constituent table | 2025View source ↗ | Moderately hard to hardThe range crosses the USGS hard-water threshold of 121 mg/L; hardness concerns scale and spotting, not a health violation. |
| Chloramine | 3.3 ppm“Your water” value in the results table; range 0.93–4.7 ppm | 2025View source ↗ | Report lists no violation; benchmark 4 ppm MRDLChloramine is used for disinfection. A filtration system targeting it needs the appropriate media and contact time; a single sample is not the same as the regulated annual measure. |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 13.8 ppbUtility-reported “Your water” result; not the maximum sample | 2025View source ↗ | Below 80 ppb comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap. |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 9.3 ppbUtility-reported “Your water” result; not the maximum sample | 2025View source ↗ | Below 60 ppb comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap. |
| Fluoride | 0.7 ppmUtility-reported “Your water” result | 2025View source ↗ | Below 4 ppm comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap. |
| Nitrate as nitrogen | 0.7 ppmUtility-reported “Your water” result | 2025View source ↗ | Below 10 ppm comparisonBelow the report’s stated benchmark; this does not mean absent or describe an individual tap. |
| Lead | 3.1 ppb90th-percentile tap sampling result; zero sites above the action level | 2025View source ↗ | Below 15 ppb action levelThis system-level sampling statistic is not a result for your home; plumbing can affect lead at an individual tap. |
| Copper | 0.42 ppm90th-percentile tap sampling result; zero sites above the action level | 2025View source ↗ | Below 1.3 ppm action levelBelow the action level used in this report; this is not a measurement at every customer’s tap. |
| PFAS | Not verified No compound-specific result assessed in this summary | 2025 report reviewView source ↗ | Cannot assess high or lowThis does not establish whether PFAS are present or absent. Check compound-specific testing before choosing treatment. |
ppm ≈ mg/L; ppb ≈ µg/L; ppt ≈ ng/L in drinking water. Hardness in gpg = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.1. ND means not detected at the method’s reporting limit—not zero.
MCL is a maximum contaminant level. MRDL is a disinfectant limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles and are not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational annual averages.
PFOA/PFOS comparisons use EPA’s 4 ppt values. Historical detections are not a present compliance finding; EPA assesses compliance using running annual averages. Rule implementation is being reviewed. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Fort Worth treats surface water from Lake Worth, Lake Bridgeport, Eagle Mountain Lake, Benbrook Lake, Richland-Chambers Reservoir and Cedar Creek Reservoir. The report also notes a short supplemental supply from TRA in late 2025.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
Fort Worth treats surface water from several reservoirs. The report labels some results as ‘Your water’ and lists individual ranges separately; these are retained rather than relabelled as tap measurements. Customers of another retail utility should use that utility's report.
A useful local question
Its reported 108–150 mg/L hardness range reaches the hard category. Filtration plus softening makes sense when reducing scale and spots is a goal; a current incoming-water test determines the home's actual softener setting.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Sources checked October 23, 2026
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.