Hardness
Very hard average220mg/L as CaCO₃
zone average; range 100–300
USGS hardness classes
About 12.9 gpg, calculated from mg/L. Confirm your supply zone and current hardness before choosing treatment.
2025
View source ↗Your local water, explained
Same city. Two supply zones with very different hardness.
Long Beach Utilities reports 220 mg/L average hardness in MWD zone 114 and 76 mg/L in blended zone 325. The first is very hard; the second is moderately hard. Confirm your zone below to see a filtration and softening recommendation grounded in the right supply.
Your water → your home → your system
Your water
Check your water bill for Long Beach Utilities, then confirm whether your home receives MWD zone 114 or blended zone 325. Ask the utility if your bill does not show the zone.
Both choices are Long Beach Utilities. The supply zone changes the hardness recommendation.
Confirm the provider on your bill, or choose “Other / not sure” to continue without a matched report.
These are utility measurements, not a test at your tap or a current service advisory. Sources checked October 28, 2026
2025 utility report; sampling years shown beside each result
Select this exact provider and supply system. A city, county or ZIP match alone does not confirm the water reaching your home.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
220mg/L as CaCO₃
zone average; range 100–300
USGS hardness classes
About 12.9 gpg, calculated from mg/L. Confirm your supply zone and current hardness before choosing treatment.
2025
View source ↗2.15mg/L
citywide highest annual average; range 0.33–2.84
MRDL: 4 mg/L
This citywide result applies to both reported zones; filtration should be selected for chloramine.
2025
View source ↗35µg/L (ppb)
citywide highest locational annual average; range 28–48
MCL: 80 ppb
Value from the original 2025 PDF report. Not an individual tap measurement.
2025
View source ↗10.2µg/L (ppb)
citywide highest locational annual average; range 5–12
MCL: 60 ppb
2025
View source ↗0.69mg/L
zone average; range 0.63–0.74
California MCL: 2 mg/L
Fluoride reduction is a separate treatment goal; standard filtration is not a fluoride-removal promise.
2025
View source ↗<5µg/L (ppb)
citywide 90th percentile; 63 sampled taps
Report action level: 15 ppb
The report says <DLR; its footnote defines lead DLR as 5 ppb. No samples exceeded 15 ppb. Your own plumbing still matters.
2025
View source ↗1.3µg/L (ppb)
zone average; range 0.9–1.8
MCL: 10 ppb
Below a legal limit does not mean absent.
2025
View source ↗Not detected29 tested compounds
four quarters of UCMR5 testing
Compound-specific reporting limits
The 2025 report carries forward these historical results. Nondetect does not mean zero.
2023–2024
View source ↗Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 220 mg/L as CaCO₃zone average; range 100–300 | 2025View source ↗ | Very hard averageAbout 12.9 gpg, calculated from mg/L. Confirm your supply zone and current hardness before choosing treatment. |
| Chloramine | 2.15 mg/Lcitywide highest annual average; range 0.33–2.84 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 4 mg/L limitThis citywide result applies to both reported zones; filtration should be selected for chloramine. |
| TTHMs | 35 µg/L (ppb)citywide highest locational annual average; range 28–48 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 80 ppb limitValue from the original 2025 PDF report. Not an individual tap measurement. |
| HAA5 | 10.2 µg/L (ppb)citywide highest locational annual average; range 5–12 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 60 ppb limit |
| Fluoride | 0.69 mg/Lzone average; range 0.63–0.74 | 2025View source ↗ | Below California’s 2 mg/L limitFluoride reduction is a separate treatment goal; standard filtration is not a fluoride-removal promise. |
| Lead | <5 µg/L (ppb)citywide 90th percentile; 63 sampled taps | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s action levelThe report says <DLR; its footnote defines lead DLR as 5 ppb. No samples exceeded 15 ppb. Your own plumbing still matters. |
| Arsenic | 1.3 µg/L (ppb)zone average; range 0.9–1.8 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 10 ppb limitBelow a legal limit does not mean absent. |
| PFAS | Not detected 29 tested compoundsfour quarters of UCMR5 testing | 2023–2024View source ↗ | Below reporting limitsThe 2025 report carries forward these historical results. Nondetect does not mean zero. |
| Total dissolved solids | 530 mg/Lzone average; range 300–680 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 1,000 mg/L benchmarkTDS is not a stand-alone safety test. |
| Nitrate | 0.29 mg/Lzone average; range 0.12–0.45 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 10 mg/L limit |
| Copper | 171 µg/Lcitywide 90th percentile; 63 sampled taps | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 1,300 µg/L action levelNo sampled taps exceeded the action level. |
| Bromate | 0.6 µg/LLong Beach distribution highest annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 10 µg/L limitThe report separately lists a higher value at the MWD treatment-plant outlet. |
| Sodium | 86 mg/Lzone average | 2025View source ↗ | No MCL listed in this report |
| Chloride | 93 mg/Lzone average | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 500 mg/L benchmark |
| Sulfate | 170 mg/Lzone average | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 500 mg/L benchmark |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A PHG is a health goal, not the legal limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles, not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 comparisons use locational running annual averages.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. Notification and response levels in a utility report are not maximum contaminant levels; do not infer a compliance violation from a single value. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Imported MWD water in zone 114; local groundwater and imported-water blends in zone 325. The zones have substantially different mineral content.
2025 utility report; sampling years shown beside each result
Select this exact provider and supply system. A city, county or ZIP match alone does not confirm the water reaching your home.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
76mg/L as CaCO₃
zone average; range 66–100
USGS hardness classes
About 4.4 gpg, calculated from mg/L. Confirm your supply zone and current hardness before choosing treatment.
2025
View source ↗2.15mg/L
citywide highest annual average; range 0.33–2.84
MRDL: 4 mg/L
This citywide result applies to both reported zones; filtration should be selected for chloramine.
2025
View source ↗35µg/L (ppb)
citywide highest locational annual average; range 28–48
MCL: 80 ppb
Value from the original 2025 PDF report. Not an individual tap measurement.
2025
View source ↗10.2µg/L (ppb)
citywide highest locational annual average; range 5–12
MCL: 60 ppb
2025
View source ↗0.72mg/L
zone average; range 0.68–0.77
California MCL: 2 mg/L
Fluoride reduction is a separate treatment goal; standard filtration is not a fluoride-removal promise.
2025
View source ↗<5µg/L (ppb)
citywide 90th percentile; 63 sampled taps
Report action level: 15 ppb
The report says <DLR; its footnote defines lead DLR as 5 ppb. No samples exceeded 15 ppb. Your own plumbing still matters.
2025
View source ↗0.6µg/L (ppb)
zone average; range 0.4–0.8
MCL: 10 ppb
Below a legal limit does not mean absent.
2025
View source ↗Not detected29 tested compounds
four quarters of UCMR5 testing
Compound-specific reporting limits
The 2025 report carries forward these historical results. Nondetect does not mean zero.
2023–2024
View source ↗Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 76 mg/L as CaCO₃zone average; range 66–100 | 2025View source ↗ | Moderately hard averageAbout 4.4 gpg, calculated from mg/L. Confirm your supply zone and current hardness before choosing treatment. |
| Chloramine | 2.15 mg/Lcitywide highest annual average; range 0.33–2.84 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 4 mg/L limitThis citywide result applies to both reported zones; filtration should be selected for chloramine. |
| TTHMs | 35 µg/L (ppb)citywide highest locational annual average; range 28–48 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 80 ppb limitValue from the original 2025 PDF report. Not an individual tap measurement. |
| HAA5 | 10.2 µg/L (ppb)citywide highest locational annual average; range 5–12 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 60 ppb limit |
| Fluoride | 0.72 mg/Lzone average; range 0.68–0.77 | 2025View source ↗ | Below California’s 2 mg/L limitFluoride reduction is a separate treatment goal; standard filtration is not a fluoride-removal promise. |
| Lead | <5 µg/L (ppb)citywide 90th percentile; 63 sampled taps | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s action levelThe report says <DLR; its footnote defines lead DLR as 5 ppb. No samples exceeded 15 ppb. Your own plumbing still matters. |
| Arsenic | 0.6 µg/L (ppb)zone average; range 0.4–0.8 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 10 ppb limitBelow a legal limit does not mean absent. |
| PFAS | Not detected 29 tested compoundsfour quarters of UCMR5 testing | 2023–2024View source ↗ | Below reporting limitsThe 2025 report carries forward these historical results. Nondetect does not mean zero. |
| Total dissolved solids | 280 mg/Lzone average; range 250–320 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 1,000 mg/L benchmarkTDS is not a stand-alone safety test. |
| Nitrate | ND mg/Lzone average; range ND–0.22 | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 10 mg/L limit |
| Copper | 171 µg/Lcitywide 90th percentile; 63 sampled taps | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 1,300 µg/L action levelNo sampled taps exceeded the action level. |
| Bromate | 0.6 µg/LLong Beach distribution highest annual average | 2025View source ↗ | Below the 10 µg/L limitThe report separately lists a higher value at the MWD treatment-plant outlet. |
| Sodium | 68 mg/Lzone average | 2025View source ↗ | No MCL listed in this report |
| Chloride | 43 mg/Lzone average | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 500 mg/L benchmark |
| Sulfate | 32 mg/Lzone average | 2025View source ↗ | Below the report’s 500 mg/L benchmark |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A PHG is a health goal, not the legal limit. Lead/copper action levels use system sampling percentiles, not a safe-tap threshold. TTHM/HAA5 comparisons use locational running annual averages.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. Notification and response levels in a utility report are not maximum contaminant levels; do not infer a compliance violation from a single value. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Imported MWD water in zone 114; local groundwater and imported-water blends in zone 325. The zones have substantially different mineral content.
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
A Long Beach address does not tell you which supply-zone average applies. Ask Long Beach Utilities to confirm your zone if it is not shown on your bill. Chloramine, byproducts and lead are reported citywide, while hardness, fluoride and arsenic have separate zone values. These are utility figures, not a test at your tap.
A useful local question
The imported-water zone’s 220 mg/L average supports recommending a softener for scale control. The blended zone’s 76 mg/L average is moderately hard, so use current home hardness and your goals before choosing softening. Both zones need filtration selected for chloramine if disinfectant taste is your concern.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Sources checked October 28, 2026
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.