2025 report; sample dates shown in full report
Select this exact provider and supply system. A city, county or ZIP match alone does not confirm the water reaching your home.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
240 mg/L regional estimate
MyTapWater shows a Pinal County USGS-based regional estimate of 240 mg/L as CaCO₃ (about 14 gpg), not a measurement from this utility or your tap. The 2025 utility report does not list hardness. Confirm incoming hardness before sizing or setting a softener.
USGS: hard >120; very hard >180 mg/L as CaCO₃
1.6mg/L
AWC monthly 2025 average; range 1.51–1.66
4 mg/L MRDL
0.72–0.87mg/L
AWC July 2024 sample range
4 mg/L MCL
5.7µg/L
2025 highest locational running annual average; range 1.4–5.7; AWC + AJWD
10 µg/L MCL
ND–1.59mg/L
2025 range; AWC + AJWD
10 mg/L MCL
16.1µg/L
AWC 2025 compliance value; range 0.5–26.2
80 µg/L MCL
1.1µg/L
AWC 2025 compliance value; range ND–4.2
60 µg/L MCL
8.4–11µg/L
AWC May 2021 / July 2024 samples
100 µg/L MCL
2025 report; sample dates shown in full report
Select this exact provider and supply system. A city, county or ZIP match alone does not confirm the water reaching your home.
See the amount, the comparison and what it means. “Below” refers to the stated benchmark, not zero risk.
Above 10.5 gpg — guidance
The district’s undated hardness guide describes its blended supply as above 10.5 gpg. Its 232 mg/L (13.5 gpg) Well 5 reading is dated November 6, 2014; it is not a current system average. Test your incoming water for sizing.
USGS: hard >120; very hard >180 mg/L as CaCO₃
0.93mg/L
2025 running annual average; range 0.82–0.93; combined report label
4 mg/L MRDL
Not listed in this table
2025 report; no numeric result shown
No comparison possible
2.9µg/L
2025 reported value; range 1.4–2.9
10 µg/L MCL
0–0.48mg/L
2025 range
10 mg/L MCL
75 µg/L; range 31.1–97.2
2025 summary value; separate Q2 violation notice
80 µg/L MCL; evaluated using LRAA
21µg/L
2025 reported value; range 14–28.9
60 µg/L MCL
0.98mg/L
2025 highest listed; range <0.02–0.98
1 mg/L MCL
Continue with your home details for general filtration guidance. We will not use another utility’s numbers as your result.
Find My Water System →A city report cannot establish a well’s water quality. Well-water treatment depends on your test results and site conditions.
Explore well-water systems →Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 240 mg/L regional estimate MyTapWater shows a Pinal County USGS-based regional estimate of 240 mg/L as CaCO₃ (about 14 gpg), not a measurement from this utility or your tap. The 2025 utility report does not list hardness. Confirm incoming hardness before sizing or setting a softener. | Undated regional estimate; utility CCR: 2025View source ↗ | Very hard regional estimate |
| Chlorine | 1.6 mg/LAWC monthly 2025 average; range 1.51–1.66 | 2025View source ↗ | Below disinfectant benchmark4 mg/L MRDL |
| Fluoride | 0.72–0.87 mg/LAWC July 2024 sample range | 2024View source ↗ | Below limit; older sample year4 mg/L MCL |
| Arsenic | 5.7 µg/L2025 highest locational running annual average; range 1.4–5.7; AWC + AJWD | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 µg/L MCL |
| Nitrate as nitrogen | ND–1.59 mg/L2025 range; AWC + AJWD | 2025View source ↗ | Maximum below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes | 16.1 µg/LAWC 2025 compliance value; range 0.5–26.2 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit80 µg/L MCL |
| Haloacetic acids | 1.1 µg/LAWC 2025 compliance value; range ND–4.2 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit60 µg/L MCL |
| Total chromium | 8.4–11 µg/LAWC May 2021 / July 2024 samples | 2021 / 2024View source ↗ | Below limit; older sample years100 µg/L MCL |
| Sodium | 160–180 mg/LAWC July 2024 range | 2024View source ↗ | No high/low rating assignedNo limit listed in report |
| Lithium | 733 µg/L average AWC June / December 2024; range 590–796 | 2024View source ↗ | Detected; no legal-limit ratingNo MCL listed in report |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Source blends and service areas can differ. Read the utility’s source-water description in the original report and confirm the system on your bill.
Selected results with the original sampling dates and measurement basis. Open the utility report for every parameter, notice and footnote.
Open the complete utility report ↗
| What was measured | Reported amount | Sample year / source date | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Above 10.5 gpg — guidance The district’s undated hardness guide describes its blended supply as above 10.5 gpg. Its 232 mg/L (13.5 gpg) Well 5 reading is dated November 6, 2014; it is not a current system average. Test your incoming water for sizing. | Undated guidance; cited well sample: November 6, 2014View source ↗ | Very hard — utility guidance |
| Chlorine / chloramine | 0.93 mg/L2025 running annual average; range 0.82–0.93; combined report label | 2025View source ↗ | Below disinfectant benchmark4 mg/L MRDL |
| Fluoride | Not listed in this table 2025 report; no numeric result shown | 2025View source ↗ | Unknown is not zeroNo comparison possible |
| Arsenic | 2.9 µg/L2025 reported value; range 1.4–2.9 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit10 µg/L MCL |
| Nitrate | 0–0.48 mg/L2025 range | 2025View source ↗ | Maximum below listed limit10 mg/L MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes | 75 µg/L; range 31.1–97.2 2025 summary value; separate Q2 violation notice | 2025View source ↗ | Violation notice reported — see context80 µg/L MCL; evaluated using LRAA |
| Haloacetic acids | 21 µg/L2025 reported value; range 14–28.9 | 2025View source ↗ | Below listed limit60 µg/L MCL |
| Chlorite | 0.98 mg/L2025 highest listed; range <0.02–0.98 | 2025View source ↗ | Close to limit; monitoring gap also reported1 mg/L MCL |
| Sodium | 100–110 mg/L2025 range | 2025View source ↗ | No high/low rating assignedNo limit listed in report |
| Selenium | 0–2.3 µg/L2025 range | 2025View source ↗ | Maximum below listed limit50 µg/L MCL |
In drinking water, ppm ≈ mg/L, ppb ≈ µg/L and ppt ≈ ng/L. Calculated hardness in grains per US gallon (gpg) = mg/L as CaCO₃ ÷ 17.118, rounded to one decimal. ND means below the reporting limit, not zero.
MCL is an enforceable contaminant limit; MRDL is a disinfectant limit. A secondary guideline concerns aesthetics. TTHM/HAA5 compliance uses locational running annual averages; read the utility’s notices as well as individual results.
PFAS results are compound-specific. Source monitoring, entry-point samples and tap tests are different. A detected result does not identify every PFAS compound or establish the level at your home. Read the original report for context and current utility notices. EPA PFAS benchmarks and implementation ↗
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.
Source water. Source blends and service areas can differ. Read the utility’s source-water description in the original report and confirm the system on your bill.
Email delivery is coming soon. Copy the report link to share it now.
More about your local water
Two providers. Different reports and hardness evidence.
Use the district’s provider lookup if you are unsure which company serves your home. Some AWC report rows include Water District source samples, but that does not make every result interchangeable. The district’s often-quoted 13.5 gpg reading is a 2014 well sample, not a current citywide average.
A useful local question
Use the district’s provider lookup if you are unsure which company serves your home. Some AWC report rows include Water District source samples, but that does not make every result interchangeable. The district’s often-quoted 13.5 gpg reading is a 2014 well sample, not a current citywide average.
We keep each utility’s results separate, show the reported sample year, and distinguish averages, maxima and tap-sampling percentiles. Hardness classifications use USGS ranges. Missing data stays unknown.
Source checks: October 29–November 2, 2026. Layout updated November 4, 2026.
Your water → your home → your system
Choose the system size, keep useful existing equipment, and review your filtration goals.